Why we didn't build a lawyer directory: the Lexicomb story, part 1

CEO Blogs
Why we didn't build a lawyer directory: the Lexicomb story, part 1

I work at GRATA International, an international law firm. Every so often a client needs help in another country, and the same question comes up every time: who can we trust with this client over there?

Finding a lawyer isn't hard. You can search online or ask colleagues. What's hard is knowing in advance how good they are, whether the price is fair, whether they really work in that country and what their offer covers. You can't tell if the reviews are real, what happens once you've wired the money, or what to do if the work never gets done.

That question is where Lexicomb started in early 2026. I've split the story into three parts. This one covers the two models we dropped and the principle that came out of them; part two explains how choice and trust work, and part three looks under the hood.

Speed wasn't the problem

The obvious pitch was "we'll do it faster." We dropped it early, because in some countries the registration itself takes only a few days, so there's little to gain on speed.

The hard part is choosing who to trust with the work and getting that choice right. Clients make it blind, and a wrong choice costs far more than a few extra days. So we framed the core question like this: how do you choose a provider in an unfamiliar country and close the deal with them safely?

Model 1: a lawyer directory

The earliest version was simple. A client comes to Lexicomb, we match them with lawyers, and we pass the lead along. In other words, a directory or a lead generator.

We compared two versions. In a light marketplace, Lexicomb introduces the two sides and steps away. In a managed marketplace, the platform stays inside the deal: the request, the offers, the choice, the payment, the work, disputes, refunds and ratings all go through it.

The easiest way to see the difference is a trip across town. Google Maps is a light marketplace: it shows you where the place is and how to get there, and then you make the trip yourself. Uber is a managed one. You set the route and the details, get an offer with a price, accept it, and a car takes you to your destination while the app takes care of payment and anything that goes wrong on the way. A lawyer directory works like the map; it shows you who's out there, and you walk the rest of the way alone.

The light version looked better at first because it was easier to build. Then the flaw showed. If the platform only makes the introduction, it has nothing left to offer either side once they've met. The lawyer gets the client through Lexicomb and suggests working directly from then on. We discussed non-circumvention clauses, billing through the platform, built-in messaging, holding payments and penalties, and that discussion is where Lexicomb started turning from a directory into a marketplace that runs the deal itself.

Model 2: fixed-price packages

In March we considered the opposite approach, standardizing the services themselves: "Company registration in Kazakhstan, $X." "Company registration in the UAE, $Y." The client buys a product and Lexicomb assigns the provider.

This model has real upsides. The client understands what they're buying, checkout is simple, the price is predictable, and product pages are easy to rank in search. We even considered launching with a single product, business registration in Kazakhstan for foreigners, under the line "The easiest way to start a business in Kazakhstan."

I turned it down, because nobody can package legal work as an identical product. Two good lawyers will quote different prices, define the scope differently, need different timelines and solve the problem in different ways. Force everyone to sell the same package at the same price and you lose what a marketplace is for: competing offers.

The principle that stayed

Those two rejections left us with the principle Lexicomb is built on: structure the choice, not the supply. We standardize how a client chooses a legal service, and leave the service itself to the provider.

It sounds simple, yet the rest of the mechanics follow from it: how the client describes the task, how providers reply, and why the client can trust them. That's what part two is about.

If you're planning a business in Kazakhstan, Kyrguzstan or Azerbaijan, describe your task on Lexicomb and compare offers before you choose anyone.

FAQ

Ready to launch your business in the right jurisdiction?

Submit your request once. Compare verified legal offers. Move forward with confidence.

Start my business